I was brought to tears while reading the Translators Notes found in the 1611 Authorized Version (not the revised version) King James Bible. I think it answers the questions. I will take my stand with the A.V.
http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/pref1611.htm
Resources that support a King James Version Only View
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 6:07 pm
- Location: Port Orchard, WA, USA
- Contact:
Tom Lamb
See Tom Lamb's Radical Pilgrim site and his page called The (Infallible) Book
"Back to the cross, the root, the word @
The Radical Pilgrim
~ Pro Bible ~ Pro Apologetics ~ Pro Kingdom ~
All scripture quotations from the Authorized Bible, without apologies. Placed accents mine.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The (Infallible) Book
Seek ye out of the book of the Lord and read
Is. 34:16"
"Back to the cross, the root, the word @
The Radical Pilgrim
~ Pro Bible ~ Pro Apologetics ~ Pro Kingdom ~
All scripture quotations from the Authorized Bible, without apologies. Placed accents mine.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The (Infallible) Book
Seek ye out of the book of the Lord and read
Is. 34:16"
Last edited by jimbaum on Tue Nov 21, 2006 6:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 6:07 pm
- Location: Port Orchard, WA, USA
- Contact:
Henry M. Morris
A Creationist's Defense of the King James Bible
by Henry M. Morris
"In this day of rapid change, when many Christians have suddenly started using one of the many modern English translations of the Bible (NASB, NIV, NEB, NRSV, NKJV, etc.), abandoning the long-used King James Version read and loved by English-speaking people of all ages and walks of life for over ten generations, it may be appropriate to review a few of the reasons why many creationists, including this writer, still prefer to use the latter."
by Henry M. Morris
"In this day of rapid change, when many Christians have suddenly started using one of the many modern English translations of the Bible (NASB, NIV, NEB, NRSV, NKJV, etc.), abandoning the long-used King James Version read and loved by English-speaking people of all ages and walks of life for over ten generations, it may be appropriate to review a few of the reasons why many creationists, including this writer, still prefer to use the latter."